In "6.2.7.15 Continuous Integration" there is a reference to '(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' but the doc is for GuixSD '(gnu services cuirass)'.
And git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix/maintenance.git/hydra/bayfront.scm also uses GuixSD '(gnu services cuirass)'. So here is the question... Is it correct to assume that the primary cuirass way forward is (gnu servies cuirass) on GuixSD? If so, should the reference to '(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' be removed? TIA - George
