Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:36:08AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: >> >> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:20:53PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> >> It's not a bad idea to build it on Hydra. Hydra already builds a >> >> usb-image / disk-image job [0], so we could add a qemu-image job, too. >> > >> > Actually, we used to build a qemu-image on Hydra, but we removed because >> > it was troublesome and unused. >> > >> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=a3a27745013f3e5a287de3bf0187b2f72beb6965 >> > >> > Maybe we should try again :) >> >> Yup, we could reinstate it if needed. That said, we wouldn’t too many >> downloads from hydra.gnu.org… > > If we took that route, I'd point the Serveraptor admin to the Hydra link > and ask them to download it once themselves, rather than having each > client download it. > > But, making a qemu-image at each evaluation is not so good for > general distribution, because we won't have tested it as thoroughly as > the release image. We'd want the qemu-image to build only if all the > system tests passed.
Yeah I think recent Hydra can present a release page if and only if some other derivations also succeeded with the same commit. Anyway, let us know what you think is the right approach for now! Thanks, Ludo’.
