ng0 <contact....@cryptolab.net> skribis: > On 17-03-06 11:13:32, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> ng0 <contact....@cryptolab.net> skribis: >> >> > moving on, this could be improved: >> > In case one aims for keeping the config public this is a bad idea but >> > what about creating the hostname + private_key in $name as plain-file? >> > Would this be overwritten by (tor-hidden-service) or would this just be >> > bad practice but "whatever works for you"? >> >> Tor is stateful here: it creates the >> /var/lib/tor/hidden-services/SERVICE directory once, and then never >> touches it again. >> >> Do you think our documentation should be improved? Could you suggest a >> patch that improves things, while at the same time not paraphrasing too >> much of Tor’s own documentation?
[...] > What do you think about the private-key + hostname option? Too much > of bad practice to implement it for the service? What do you mean? Now that I checked, I see the documentation explains exactly what I wrote above, with a link to upstream’s documentation for details. What should we add? > I was thinking of adding a (tor-relay-node) once I have the option to > run a GuixSD system not in my home and/or other circumstances are > solved which now prevent certain things. Would be nice. Thanks, Ludo’.
