On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:01:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'. > > > > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken > > (as they are right now). > > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way > > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full > > (with all the features you can have enabled)? > > > > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with > > what we agreed on. > > > > And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds > like opium combined with onion and I don't want that. >
I've been sitting on a patch for ranger for a while. I also couldn't decide between packaging just ranger or also linking in the various programs it calls. I think that if mc would use libcaca to display an image, and just installing libcaca in profile would satisfy that dependancy, then leaving it out is "not great, but acceptable". -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
