On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:51:20PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:51:47AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> skribis:
> >
> > >> + ;; Force Aarch64 libdir to be /lib and not /lib64
> > >> + (substitute* "gcc/config/aarch64/t-aarch64-linux"
> > >> + (("lib64") "lib"))
> > >> +
> > >
> > > I'd amend the comment to say why.
> >
> > I think we should just skip this patch. There’s no reason one
> > architecture should be treated different from the others in that
> > respect.
> >
> > WDYT, Efraim?
> >
> > Ludo’.
>
> I don't think it should cause a problem either way. As far as I can tell
> it doesn't make a difference to the software built further down the
> line.
> Looks like I spoke too soon. I tried to build gccgo which failed at the linking stage, since it turned out libgcc_s was in gccgo/lib64 and not gccgo/lib. I then tried gcc@4.9 and had a similar failure, the lib files were split between lib and lib64. Other than this patch (with a when file-exists), the other idea is to change libdir in gcc.scm:86 to be lib64 on aarch64. Unfortunately it looks like it'd cause a full rebuild on core-updates. I'll test it overnight and see how it goes. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
