On 17-02-11 15:28:22, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 07:48:07PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > Are there any reasons _against_ configuring 'shadow' with SELinux > > support? > > I'm not that familiar with SELinux, so I can't say one way or the other. > There were some scattered discussions about SELinux in GuixSD at FOSDEM, > but I'm not sure if we drew any conclusions or not. >
The SELinux function is based on/originated in a patch from Gentoo. Gentoo does not default to SELinux in sys-apps/shadow, it's only when you set your whole system up to use selinux. It adds the dependencies on the packages "libselinux" and "libsemanage". I think we should add it once there is a consent on how to SELinux in GuixSD. -- ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/
