Andy Wingo writes: > In some future (is it near or far?), the source -> compiled function > needs additional inputs: checksums or timestamps of "build inputs" or > so, so that when for-syntax definitions (like macros) change, users of > those definitions will recompile. That is a harder problem though.
Ah yeah, I've been bit by this before. Though, I imagine we'd run into a problem where we'd never know how to "garbage collect" anything in ~/.cache/guile/ . "Maybe not a problem", except if you're hacking some files constantly... :) Maybe every guile hacker needs to get in the habit of `rm -rf ~/.cache/guile/' though? :)
