On 17-02-09 21:38:27, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > ng0 writes: > > > It turns out that it could be as simple as providing them with the raw > > disk image, so I will give it a try soon. > > Can you share the config.scm of that?
What do you mean? I will just test generally if it works on their infrastructure. Afterwards I will set up some services for myself to have something to test the server side of things I build and package. There will be no public config to share, only at some point afterwards when I decide to share a stripped down config or set of configs. In the long run it would be nice if IN-Berlin could offer GuixSD in addition to Debian, but as we all know, there's a reason for the "beta" and until it's marked as beta I won't get to this point of discussion. Just a general check if it works. The way it works for the current Debian setup, asking for GuixSD would be no problem. No problem with a raw image, so for them it won't matter if there'll be an .iso later on. I used IN-Berlin before, started when I offered OpenNIC resolvers and a tor-relay, and more afterwards. For users based in Germany I can recommend it. I say Germany, because I have no idea if their registry system would work well for anyone not living in Germany, I don't even know about Austria. In case anyone is interested, asking via email will resolve questions. > > > Is anyone interested in the documentation or success of this experiment? > > On the future of Guix-panel it was said (by Ludo'?) that getting GuixSD > on a mainstream hosting platform was very good to have. > > I'm interested in how this goes and would like to try the gentle folks > of An Meaisín Dénártha (https://anmd.org) if that is useful. > > Greetings, > --janneke > > -- > Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org > Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl > -- ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/
