Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-28 00:16 +0100) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Mathieu OTHACEHE (2017-01-27 11:16 +0100) wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >>>>> Mathieu Othacehe (2017-01-26 13:31 +0100) wrote: >>>>> > + (uri (string-append >>>>> > + "http://melpa.org/packages/ht-" >>>>> > + version >>>>> > + ".el")) >>>>> >>>>> We can't use files from melpa.org because once a new commit appears in >>>>> the upstream repo, melpa will rebuilt the package and remove the >>>>> previous version, so this package will lost its source and will not be >>>>> buildable anymore. So please use the latest available tarballs instead. >>> >>> Ok, I'll send and update. >>> >>>> >>>> I think the linter should warn about this. It seems like you have to >>>> send this email often. >>> >>> Yes, or modify guix import for melpa ? It seems that I >>> trusted wrongly the output of the importer ... >> >> Yeah, I think adjusting guix import for that would be really great (but >> I'm not a volunteer for this task :-)) > > What needs to be done? We cannot guess the upstream URL just from the > MELPA one, can we?
Sorry, but I have never used and looked at importers, and I have no idea how they work, including the (m)elpa one, so I don't know what can be done on this subject. -- Alex