On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:41:40PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Overall the patch looks good to me. > > One question: We usually avoid packaging software that has no release or > has an “alpha” or “beta” label. Do you think we could wait for 1.1.0 to > be officially released? Or are there good reasons why we should not > wait?
ldc is pretty stable and there are many commits since the last stable release which are needed. Normally we should support 1.0.0, but since that is more than 6 months old I think we can skip that. Next round will be stable 1.1.0 (I am building a git checkout right now because I need the recent stack trace fix!). In all I suggest we support 1.1.0-beta6 and then on to 1.1.0 etc. We can add new beta's on top of that again for those who want it. Pj.
