Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> writes: > ng0 <n...@libertad.pw> writes: > >> Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> writes: >> >>> ng0 <n...@libertad.pw> writes: >>> >>>> * gnu/packages/mail.scm (notmuch-vim): New variable. >>> >>> I think vim plugins should go in vim.scm, even if it relates to a >>> package residing elsewhere. Could you send an updated patch? TIA! >> >> I disagree. Then we should split up the notmuch emacs integration >> and move it into emacs.scm by the same logic. > > The emacs files are installed with the 'notmuch' package. If they are > split out, I would argue that they should go in emacs.scm as well. > > I don't see the point in that though, since they are less than 1MB and > do not carry any extra dependencies.
With the vim removed from the inputs, I'd say this could be just another output? notmuch:vim notmuch:emacs If you use vim and try to install it you will soon realize that you need vim-full, but then we haven't fixed the ruby-mail dependency. So possibly moving it to vim is good? I have no preference I just think it's an mail application just as python-notmuch is in mail because it has something to do with notmuch and mail. But I also put ruby-mail into ruby.scm and not mail.scm and after all, does it even matter? mail.scm isn't so long that we should be bothered by one more package. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/
