ng0 <n...@libertad.pw> writes: > ... and I still am not sure wether the build system works or not (see bottom > of this email) because I still have to learn more about this language. Our > prototype will soon switch to fluid (it's currently using qml-material but I > refrained from adding that as its upstream looks like it moved on to fluid), > so apart from the prototype the only "real" application I can check this > chain on can only be added later after this has been added. Remember > panopticon, the package which got me to poke at the rust/cargo in winter of > 2015 and spring of last year? This can be made functional (finally) once I > package some more crates in addition to all the ones I send with this. > > Please provide constructive critique and review. Read the crate repositories > and their own descriptions etc. It was very hard and not intentional to end > up with tautological descriptions/synopsis. Remember that we are starting at > zero and that some (most?) of the now following crates add very basic > functionalities. > … > > > > I have not run any of the 81 packages through guix lint, I would if I would > know a way to mass lint a list of packages. > For those I checked (like rust-openssl-sys) left me in confusion. Does our > cargo build-system just build nothing? Are all of these libraries? > rust-openssl-sys contained nothing, but rust-openssl-sys:src had all the > data. Same goes for the libpsyc-rust > >
One more addition: I will only send a rebased patch series after all patches have been reviewed. As a proof of concept I can go on and add more dependencies and package panopticon (https://panopticon.re) if that's what's needed for acceptance? As written above, I will do it anyway after the patches are in. it would just add 12 - 40 (depending on how much dependencies of dependencies I'd need) more patches, so this current patch series is more friendly. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ http://ng0.chaosnet.org
