On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:55:22AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Leo & others, > > On 04/01/17 05:37, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > On 04/01/17 05:20, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> If you wanted to do extra work, I think it would also fit in a new FUSE > >> package module. > > > > Eh, why not. It's that or study. > > ...or file-systems.scm? > > I'm ambivalent about implementation choice being the right abstraction > level.
Fair point. It's up to you. I merely thought that the web module was not perfect for this package :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
