Kei Kebreau <[email protected]> writes: > Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> writes: > >> Kei Kebreau <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Indeed it is not. I've removed these inputs from the new patch. As a >>> side note, lilypond was required as a runtime dependency so I moved it >>> to propagated-inputs. >> >> Do you think it would be possible to patch the sources to refer to the >> Lilypond executable instead of propagating the input? > > Good idea! Does this patch look good to you?
Yes, thank you! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC http://elephly.net
