Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:21:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: >> >> > It would be nice to remove the grafts soon, but it's over the 1200 >> > rebuild limit for staging: >> > >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >> > >> > But, I'll put it on staging if there is a consensus. I guess that >> > staging will end up requiring more than 1200 rebuilds anyways, since >> > there could be multiple changes with that much impact, but affecting >> > different parts of the package graph. >> >> Yes, that should be OK, especially since it’s a safe change. > > I made the change, updating libtiff to 4.0.7 and building it with GCC 5, > in 0bd1097c50950d47954b4dc136654dfbde45d5b1. > > I had already updated it on core-updates; should I revert that change?
No, the next merge will detect that it’s the same thing, I guess. Ludo’.