Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> skribis: > >> This patch adds a -p and --prompt-name argument to @code{guix >> environment}, and puts the argument's value between the square brackets >> instead of "env". > > Sounds like a good idea! Maybe ‘--prompt-suffix’ would be more accurate > a name? WDYT?
I think the goal is to identify the environments by name, and whether that's by adding a suffix or a prefix doesn't really matter. So I believe we should emphasize on "name" and not on "suffix". I wanted to use --name first, but it doesn't explain why we would use -p for the short option instead of -n (which is already taken by --dry-run). WDYT? >>>From ea958e847019c94a2bde49285f1436dfec72e570 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> >> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:07:15 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] environment: Add a prompt-name argument. >> >> * guix/scripts/environment.scm: Add --prompt-name (-p) argument. > > Some cosmetic suggestions follow… :-) > >> (define* (launch-environment/container #:key command bash user-mappings >> - profile paths network?) >> + profile paths network? prompt-name) > > Make it > > (prompt-suffix %default-prompt-suffix) > > with: > > (define %default-prompt-suffix > ;; The default prompt suffix > " [env]") > > such that #:prompt-suffix is always a string. > >> + (setenv "PS1" (string-append "\\u@\\h \\w [" >> + (if (not prompt-name) >> + "env" >> + prompt-name) > > Assume ‘prompt-name’ is a string. > >> + (let* ((opts (parse-args args)) >> + (pure? (assoc-ref opts 'pure)) >> + (container? (assoc-ref opts 'container?)) >> + (network? (assoc-ref opts 'network?)) >> + (prompt-name (assoc-ref opts 'prompt-name)) > > I’d change ‘%default-options’ like this: > > (define %default-options > `(… > (prompt-suffix . ,%default-prompt-suffix))) > >> + #:prompt-name prompt-name > > Maybe add the brackets here? Like: > > #:prompt-suffix (match prompt-suffix > ("" "") ;allow for an empty suffix > ((? string? suffix) (string-append " [" suffix "]"))) > > Thanks! > > Ludo’. These are great suggestions! I will adapt it when we agree upon the long option name :). Thanks! Kind regards, Roel Janssen