Am 17.10.2016 um 22:14 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Once ‘core-updates’ is merged (hopefully in a few days), we could start > a ‘staging’ branch and put changes that require between ~300 and ~1200 > rebuilds. The idea would be to close the branch much more quickly than > core-updates (the changes should be less disruptive, with little chance > of breaking things.)
This is a good idea, too. I meant some branch like "core-updates-next", as a staging branch for the next "core-updates" cycle, too. So if he core-updates are currently build, we most likely do not want to tough it. But we could already push some changes to core-updates next to get them off our todo-lists. But maybe this is just what you call "staging" branch :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
