On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > > So the attached patch moves attic after borg and supersedes it. Is it > > expected that we have to shuffle the package definition around like > > this? > > Yes, because ‘properties’ are evaluated eagerly. > > We could change the ‘superseded’ property to always be a promise, as > Efraim suggests; we’ll see later if that’s really necessary. > > The patch LGTM.
Okay, pushed. Thanks for the details!
