On 2016-09-28 11:57, ng0 wrote:
swedebu...@riseup.net writes:
Hi
I recently installed Parabola and have played around a bit with
compiling AUR-packages to be able to run the programs I want -
packaged
or not.
Having build a lot on guixsd a while ago I noticed some differences in
the cli-overview that I would like to present.
Colorfication and arrows (=>) are used to clearly distinguish
pacaur/pacman-commands from the buildprocess output.
A nice thing I saw on some builds (build of qt during build of
telegram-desktop) was a per build process percentage indicator located
in the beginning of each line of build output like this:
[ 0% ] lorem ipsum....
[ 10% ] lorem ipsum....
In addition to these two above I have an idea as well:
Use the terminal-title wisely to show the progress of the whole
transaction and the current running build (e.g.: "Download complete.
Buildprogress 4/5: building qt"
What do you think?
The problem with colors is that the use of colors in build logs creates
very difficult to read logs if you don't filter them. I think this is
one of the reasons why we don't have colors.
I am not against it, I just think it will make helping people a little
harder when they provide such logs. On the other hand, if we manage to
filter the colors out in the build logs somehow, this is of no concern
to us.
I understand.
What I proposed was not to color the logs but the output of guix (to
distinguish it from the rest) telling the user what it is going to
do/doing.
The proposal for percentage did not include coloring.
