On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:08:37PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:12:33AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > >> I also think for reference we should keep the versions of packages it > >> needs as they are so many. On the other hand hackage keeps the list of > >> dependencies and versions of those, so... should I send a patch removing > >> these comments? > > > > I think it's better to say how to learn that information. What's there > > now will become obsolete sooner or later, and it's not clear to me how I > > could update the information. > > > > That's just taken directly from hackage and/or the initial error output > and/or the haskell setup file. > > Should I adjust it? For me the source is 'normal' you find this > information when you look for the application: > https://hackage.haskell.org/package/darcs-2.12.4
It looks like hackage provides that version information for many of their packages. So, I don't think we need to include it in our Darcs package.
