On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:07:48 -0500 Eric Bavier <ericbav...@openmailbox.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:31:44 +0200 > David Craven <da...@craven.ch> wrote: > > > > Is the purpose of this patch to make importers return licenses with this > > > prefix or is there another use case? > > > > Yes that's the intention. I was only thinking about the python > > importer, but this will affect all importers. > > > > I don't think this needs to happen. Whether or not the symbol in the > 'license' field of a package needs the 'license:' prefix depends on > the module where the package definition is placed. I'm not convinced > that globally applying the prefix is useful. I just wanted to point out that this will not work for any cpan modules that are destined for (gnu packages perl) if they don't use the Perl license. `~Eric
