Ludovic Courtès writes: > This would be a bad idea. The user-agent string above was chosen so > that users fall into a large “anonymity set”. If we applied this patch, > then web servers could trivially identify us. > > On this topic, see: > > https://panopticlick.eff.org/
Thanks for the explanation! With either user agent string, I get the same results btw: unique fingerprint. Of course, using GuixSD may be a bit less common than Windows NT today, but times are changing ;-) Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
