Hi, you possibly need to rebase the patch which adds awesome, I shortened the description of the package in master: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00317.html
I have not tested your patch after this, just a reminder that this was changed recently. ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > gno <gno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 9/2/2016 2:53 PM, ng0 wrote: >> >>> For some reason xrandr started to kill awesome (X11) session when I >>> apply my layout now. I checked with arandr and also with --dryrun if my >>> layout is the problem, but there's nothing faulty. >>> Maybe there are changes which can't just be installed in my user profile >>> and need to in system. >> >> Hmm, that's not good. No errors or other logs ? > > Could be unrelated. Could be because I did not launch it in a vm but in > my actual live system. This is not a criteria to reject patches, if > anything this is a bug on my end, and if it's a bug in the package, it > is unlikely you introduced it (I would even say impossible, looking at > the patches), there's nothing which could cause this. > >> Also, since I yet again didn't include the list in my previous response: >> >> On 9/2/2016 12:43 PM, ng0 wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for your patches. >>> It works, I'm currently using this patchset. >>> Some minor improvements can be made (comments style) which in my opinion >>> the person commiting your patch can apply. >> >> Please, I'd appreciate any hints as to how I could improve my comment >> style. Don't hold back >> >> Thanks for testing. >> > > -- > ng0 > For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org > -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
