On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 04:47:52PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Upstream is aware of this and told me they are working on a port towards > qt5 and also python3. However there is no deadline. It is their > choice. As I recently read there are people using Guix who are > interested in using PyBitmessage. > This package is usable, license fits, I find this block you create a bit > harsh. I can understand it, but does it mean that you are against adding > it at all because of qt4?
I am not blocking, it is just a bit frustrating to go backwards! If there is no other solution and no easy replacement for the package you wish to add, we could revert my previous commit. I am just feeling uneasy about packages that are not maintained by upstream and do not receive security updates any more. Andreas
