David Craven <da...@craven.ch> skribis: > I updated the license information for the packages. It's an > improvement over what was already commited. I called it a isc derived > license. If someone wants me to take further steps I need clear > instructions on how to proceed. =)
In cases where a package is multiply-licensed, or if it contains code under different licenses, we usually list them in the ‘license’ field with a comment above stating which of these two cases it is. When a package provides a license that is not found in (guix licenses), then we use the catch-all ‘x11-style’, ‘non-copyleft’, or ‘fsf-free’ procedures, ideally with the URL of the license text and a comment. That’s the informal decision chart that I use. :-) Ludo’.
