On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:34:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: > > Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > > > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote: > > > > > I don't see a way to apply this patch "on the CentOS side" except for > > > waiting (another two or three years) until they upgrade Automake. > > > > When packaging guix for CentOS, just add a patch to the source package > > definition.. > > I do not intend to create an RPM package for CentOS, I am merely trying > to do the following: > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git > cd guix > ./bootstrap > ./configure > makeI see, I haven't thought about that... But, in that case, wouldn't be creating guix RPM package for CentOS even more beneficial alternative (making it easy for all CentOS7 users...)? Best regards, S_WThat would require keeping it up-to-date.
Actually I think that this particular patch could be replaced by script snippet (untested) in spec: for dir in doc emacs gnu nix; do sed "s@%D%@${dir}@g" "${dir}/local.mk" done Furthermore, it requires usually fix once per release - when user run `guix pull', it becomes irrelevant what is user running (but daemon changes). I must say I'm impressed by the effort to fully maintain CentOS 7 to 2020. If you don't want to go package way (which I think is prefferable) I'm not against the reverting patch anymore. Best regards, S_W
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature