On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:54:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:48:10PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: flex: Fix CVE-2016-6354. > > >> > > >> * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex)[replacement]: New field. > > >> (flex/fixed): New variable. > > >> * gnu/packages/patches/flex-CVE-2016-6354.patch: New file. > > >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > > > > > As Mark pointed out on #guix, bugs in flex's generated code can not be > > > addressed with a graft. > > > > Indeed. We should add this patch to ‘core-updates’ and start building > > it (I haven’t checked the status of the various branches, though.) > > Done as eba7fab890. > > I'm not sure of the overall health of the branch, but I have built some > packages from it locally on x86_64. So, the base system seems to be > working. >
I somehow managed to push a lot to the branch, and currently cmake is broken, both the "old" version and the "new" version I pushed. They are broken in the same way, so (based on nothing at all) I assume its related to the file update. Also, gcc-4.9.4 causes the same breakage on arm as 5.3.0 did. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
