Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> writes: > >> When incorporating a copyleft licensed program with a lax licensed program, >> it is correct to preserve the original license notice. See also: >> >> https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html >> >> base64.scm did not do this. This is important, because it is part of >> the license that the copyright header be preserved, so we must do this >> to comply correctly. >> >> (This is a common confusion: adding a stronger copyleft does not >> "relicense" the original work.) > > Thank you for this patch. I’m not familiar with these licensing details > but what you write looks plausible to me. > > ~~ Ricardo
Ok cool, pushed!
