On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:19:05AM +0200, David Craven wrote: > > So, I do think it's a good idea to use that string as documentation but, > > in this case, I think that using "qtbase" is inappropriate. What do you > > think? > > So what would be a better string? "needs qtbase"?
I would just use "qt", and mention that it should instead use qtbase in a code comment.
