Yes, would have probably been better. I got sidetracked today, but I intend to get it fixed over the weekend.
On Aug 19, 2016 8:42 PM, "Mark H Weaver" <m...@netris.org> wrote: > David Craven <da...@craven.ch> writes: > > >> Thank you for all of this! Hydra indicates that there are some > >> regressions. Can you take a look? > >> > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109084#tabs-now-fail > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109084#tabs-new > > > > Ah, now I understand where the fun in distributing starts =P It may > > take me a while... Aren't minor releases supposed to be backwards > > compatible? > > I don't know, ask the Qt developers. Anyway, it's probably better to do > these kinds of upgrades on a separate branch to allow regressions to be > fixed without leaving 'master' broken in the meantime. We can ask hydra > to build another branch and check for regressions there before merging > to master. > > Mark >
