David Craven (2016-08-17 22:27 +0300) wrote: >>> I don't believe you :-) >> >> Oh, that's embarrassing. I must have forgotten to change the hash and >> guix cached the tarball. Is that possible? > > Sorry about that. I make many stupid mistakes, but I'm not a liar... ;-)
Oh, I didn't mean that! I just wanted to say that it works as expected, so you probably made some mistake. As for the hash, yes it's possible as Leo explained. -- Alex
