On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:06:15PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Thu 04 Aug 2016 14:36, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: > > > Unfortunately, when I tried to push it to 'master', it was rejected > > because of 56 unsigned commits on the 'core-updates' branch. > > What's the rationale for requiring non-HEAD commits to be signed when > pushing? For me a signed HEAD implicitly signs all parent comments, in > my mental trust model anyway :)
How would the rest of us distinguish between 1) a range of your commits with a signed HEAD 2) a range of your commits with a signed HEAD that you pushed after I pushed a commit created with `git commit --author="Andy Wingo"
