Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> writes: >> Should I review v3 or v4? > > v4. I made a mistake in v3 - that's why it has a hole in the series - I > didn't send it. > >> It would be easier if the patches would have references in one single >> thread, but I can work this way too. > > Huh, they should be a tree with the cover letter at the root now.
Sorry, my mistake this should have been more precise: I meant to say: It can lead to confusion when there are several threads with different versions of the patches, including singles ones, not bundled, and bundled ones. I will start looking into these patches now, thanks. >>If this >> makes all the packages before obsolete I'll mark them as such and review >> only these versions. > > It does make all the "perl" packages (only perl) by me from before obsolete. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
