Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> skribis:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:49:35 +0200 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> > (u-boot u-boot-configuration-u-boot ; package >> > (default (@ (gnu packages u-boot) (make-u-boot-package >> > board)))) >> >> The default value has invalid syntax. Should be simply: >> >> (default (make-u-boot-package board)) >> >> but I think this doesn’t work (‘board’ will be unbound; yeah, >> counter-intuitive.) >> >> You could instead do (default #f) and call ‘make-u-boot-package’ when >> that value is #f. >> >> > (define (eye-candy config root-fs system port) >> > "dummy" >> > (mlet* %store-monad ((image #f)) >> > (return (and image >> > #~(format #$port ""))))) >> > >> >> Simply remove it. :-) > > Yeah, but there's a > > (mlet %store-monad ((sugar (eye-candy config store-fs system #~port))) > > in the same file. > > Can I remove that and #$sugar , too? Will it still work? Yes. > Also, I'm trying to s/grub.cfg/bootloader-configuration-file/g right now, but > I wonder > > (1) Whether it's possible to determine the basename of the config-file > derivation in order to find out what bootloader to install > (2) Whether we want to do it that way > > . > > If so, we could have a install-bootloader routine that detects what the > filename of the bootloader-configuration-file object is and then calls either > install-grub or install-u-boot. I think we need two separate procedures on the build side: ‘install-grub’, and ‘install-u-boot’. Choosing between GRUB and U-Boot should happen on the “host side”, mostly likely in (gnu system). HTH, Ludo’.
