Hi, Vincent Legoll <vincent.leg...@gmail.com> skribis:
> But resurrection & real use of patchwork (or any other consensus > web tracker) would be a plus for at least some of us newcomers > from different horizons. The instance at <http://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/guix/list/> is not widely used, it seems. Part of the problem is that it often does not automatically detect whether a patch has already been committed (requiring manual intervention), and does not recognize patch series and revisions. Newer versions of Patchwork fix the latter, as can be seen at <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/glibc/list/>. Not sure about the former. Maybe we could register at ozlabs.org to see the difference? > I can understand the repulsion against some of them, but a PR-like > enabled one could ease the on-boarding of new contributors. So if > it's acceptable to committers, why not try to use one a bit more > regularly ? Some of us prefer an email-based workflow, though there’s no consensus. I’ve tried to look for tools that would allow not only email but also a CLI or Web UI, as you might have seen in the ML archive, but to no avail. So, concrete suggestions are welcome. :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
