> commit 95af24a2f1fb58eb9e6ee902c9330534f0aca9f3 > Author: Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> > Date: Sun Jul 24 14:58:19 2016 +0200 > > gnu: guix: Update development snapshot. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix-devel): Update to 97c8aef. > --- > gnu/packages/package-management.scm | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm > b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm > index cd58fde..878fed2 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ the Nix package manager.") > ;; > ;; Note: use a very short commit id; with a longer one, the limit on > ;; hash-bang lines would be exceeded while running the tests. > - (let ((commit "e9017c98d61f305b624bacaa30e8891ec0100980")) > + (let ((commit "97c8aef15de89799ac01b62dd9b91245c23eefcb")) > (package (inherit guix-0.10.0) > (version (string-append "0.10.0-0." (string-take commit 4)))
As Efraim noticed on #guix, the revision number wasn't updated. I think you forgot to do it, right? So now this version “0.10.0-0.97c8” looks "older" than “0.10.0-0.e901”. I don't know, should it be left as it is, or is it better to update the revision? > (source (origin > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ the Nix package manager.") > (commit commit))) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "13mfk10cw6fk4diclzld56xwabshanxjcczdrjlj0wisaz32h3nl")) > + "0sdxq87mbvig7785gzf52ywmvl3p1q1qgsczmkzrlw988xkma1dr")) > (file-name (string-append "guix-" version "-checkout")))) > (arguments > (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments guix-0.10.0) > > -- Alex
