Ricardo Wurmus (2016-07-13 00:04 +0300) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-espuds): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> index 95c8d9b..cd87c79 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
> @@ -1305,6 +1305,31 @@ syntax. Most commonly Emacs Lisp Mock is used in
> conjunction with Emacs Lisp
> Expectations, but it can be used in other contexts.")
> (license license:gpl3+)))
>
> +(define-public emacs-espuds
> + (package
> + (name "emacs-espuds")
> + (version "0.3.3")
> + (source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append "https://github.com/ecukes/espuds/";
> + "archive/v" version ".tar.gz"))
> + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "0xv551376pbmh735a3zjwc9z4qdx6ngj1vpq3xqjpn0a1rwjyn4k"))))
> + (build-system emacs-build-system)
> + (propagated-inputs
> + `(("emacs-el-mock" ,emacs-el-mock)
This is needed only for files from "test" subdir but the tests are not
run anyway. I would just remove it. Even if the tests will be checked
during the build process, "emacs-el-mock" shouldn't be propagated as it
is not a dependency of the "espuds.el". Or do I miss anything?
> + ("emacs-s" ,emacs-s)
> + ("emacs-dash" ,emacs-dash)
> + ("emacs-f" ,emacs-f)))
> + (home-page "http://github.com/ecukes/espuds";)
> + (synopsis "Common step definitions for Ecukes")
> + (description "Espuds is a collection of the most commonly used step
> +definitions for testing with the Ecukes framework.")
> + (license license:gpl3+)))
> +
> (define-public emacs-ob-ipython
> (package
> (name "emacs-ob-ipython")
--
Alex
