On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:58:58PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I haven't checked if there's a good upstream source, but a good > addition to the description could be: "This provides the qtsvg module" > (for qtsvg), or "This package provides the qtconcurrent, qtcore, qtdbus, > qtgui, qtopenglextensions, qtplatformheaders, qtplatformsupport, > qtprintsupport, qtsql, qttest, qtwidgets, qtxml modules." (for qtbase).
The first one is a bit redundant, the second one useful. Maybe other packages will also provide more than one module, then this text would be helpful. I would suggest to capitalise them as in the library names, such as "Qt5Concurrent" etc.. What do you think? Concerning Mesa, I agree that it should probably not be propagated by qtbase. Andreas
