Patrick Hetu <[email protected]> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-05-28 12:06 EDT: > >> Pushed as 9b381643f009025d97dfc0b82d2c00800c204380 with a few minor >> changes: >> >>> +(define-public guile-g-wrap >> >> This one is already available in (gnu packages guile). :-) > > Oops, I was looking for guile-g-wrap instead of g-wrap... > > Still, the current g-wrap package needs a new patch to fix his Makefile.in > because the native-search-paths hooks won't find it for Guile 2.0.
But it works well to build guile-gnome AFAICS. When is it a problem? But yeah, patching it to match the native-search-paths is a good idea. > Also, should I rename it to guile-g-wrap at the same time? I don’t think so, because it’s both a program and a library, not just a library (I see that this rule mine and is not spelled out in “Packaging Guidelines”; it probably should, if there’s consensus.) Thanks! Ludo’.
