Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:25:41PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >> > > + (add-after 'move-state-files 'wrap-program >> > >> > Do we really need this wrapper? Can’t we instead take it as a patch >> > from Debian or something? I’m not a fan of inline Bash code, and not >> > very confident of scripts that do ‘rm -rf’. :-) >> > >> Unfortunately, Debian doesn't have any related patches because it's >> state files are writable in the equivalent of our store directories. It >> seems like the bash script will have to stay for the sake of >> functionality unless someone comes up with something cleaner, though I >> prefer to avoid them. Long ago, I lost a GNU/Linux installation to >> "rm -rf"... > > If Nethack lacks the ability to configure the location of the state > files, there is still a string (or several) in the source code that > looks like '/usr/share/nethack'. I think we should change this string to > something more appropriate instead of wrapping Nethack.
Yeah, I would also prefer something along these lines. What do you think, Kei? Does that sound doable? Thanks, Ludo’.
