On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote: > > * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable. > > > + (license lgpl2.0)))) > > In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under > the GPL (no version specified) as well as one public-domain file. The > details are in the attached patch revision. > > Since I don't understand the fine points of these things, I ask the > group: can a source distribution be LGPL 2.0 and include GPL components?
I asked on #fsf, and was advised that this combination is fine. They also gave me the link to this handy GNU license compatibility matrix: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
