Hi,
I am a bit late.
David Thompson <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes:
> * guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm (gnu:unpack)
> (store-file->elisp-source-file, unpack): New procedures.
> (%standard-phases): Use the new unpack procedure.
> ---
> guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> index f0a9a6e..4fd36d1 100644
> --- a/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> +++ b/guix/build/emacs-build-system.scm
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #:use-module (guix build utils)
> #:use-module (guix build emacs-utils)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
> + #:use-module (srfi srfi-11)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
> #:use-module (ice-9 rdelim)
> #:use-module (ice-9 regex)
> @@ -39,6 +40,27 @@
> ;; archive signature.
> (define %install-suffix "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d")
>
> +(define gnu:unpack (assoc-ref gnu:%standard-phases 'unpack))
> +
> +(define (store-file->elisp-source-file file)
> + "Convert file, a store file name for an Emacs Lisp source file, into a file
> +name that has been stripped of the hash and version number."
> + (let-values (((name version)
> + (package-name->name+version
^^^
This is the old ‘package-name->name+version’ from (guix build utils)
which has been replaced when possible by a new one in (guix utils) using
'@' as a delimiter. While I think it was OK to use it to fix previously
written code, I don't want Guix to build upon the old one.
Time has come to resolve this ugly and confusing name conflict. The
problem is that I don't fully understand the rationale behind this
temporary solution, so I can't help much.
Ludo: Since you are the mind behind it, I think you are in the best
position to figure this out or at least explain to us “mere mortals”
what is possible and what is not. :)
--
Mathieu Lirzin
