On Tue 24 May 2016 20:25, Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes:
> The first, is that the hash is required, which I only had to compute > once, but if I wanted to change the package, I would have to update > this, which is prohibitive to local development. As an improvement to > this, could the hash be optional, and if it does not exist, be > calculated when the build is performed? Yes I hate this!!!! I don't know what the right solution is, but for local development somethign is needed :) I have nothing constructive to add but these things you mention are very good points. Andy
