Ludovic Courtès writes: > Thanks for your quick response, applied with an adjusted commit log.
Thanks. > I concur with Mark: this is a very sensitive area that takes time to > test and adjust, which is the main reason why it takes me so much time > to review and such ;-), so we want to make sure we don’t break it. Sure, I agree. These two real silly problems I introduced only makes me appreciate more that it takes some time to get the patches in ;-) > In the future, please make sure to test individual patches with the > known-good *-linux-gnu targets. Yes. I wrongly assumed (though that I knew and saw happen) that cross-gcc and cross-libc were used in the bootstrap process that I was thus testing them...I've seen a lot of my build host compilers and libc getting built and rebuilt. Now I know that's not the case and need to test for that when touching this area. That's still no excuse for not testing the cross-base.scm patches individually :-/ I would still like to explore getting rid of the patched gcc and all the environment variables and use a --sysroot instead; but I would need some help/inspiration to get that experiment going. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
