Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: >>> >>>> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: >>>> >>>>> I tested JUnit previously with the log4j-api package, but I cannot >>>>> submit this right now due to a bug(?) in Guile’s HTTP client, which >>>>> makes it impossible for me to download the sources of its dependencies, >>>>> such as this one: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/osgi/org.osgi.core/6.0.0/org.osgi.core-6.0.0-sources.jar >>>>> ERROR: Bad Date header: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 3:47:42 GMT >>>> >>>> ISTR you were working on a workaround for this issue. What’s the >>>> status? >>> >>> I got it fixed (after wasting a lot of time wondering why it would not >>> work as I had patched the wrong file), but the fix isn’t really pretty. >> >> [...] >> >>> From c98ca436bafe8077edaf3125b529ea32fbd48611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> >>> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:12:24 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] build: Accept dates with space-padded hour field. >>> >>> * guix/build/download.scm: Replace "parse-rfc-822-date" from the (web >>> http) module. >> >> I don’t think it’s worse than the original. ;-) >> >> To help maintenance, could you make sure there’s a Guile bug number for >> this one? And then you can submit this change to Guile itself, and >> after that backport it to Guix (with a reference to the Guile bug and >> commit.) >> >> Would that work for you? > > Sure, no problem. The bug I submitted to bug-guile received number > 23421. I already submitted my patch to guile-devel, but it seems to be > stuck in the queue for now. Once it has been committed I’ll backport > the change to Guix.
Fixed in Guile commit 16050431f29d56f80c4a8253506fc851b8441840 (not a great fix due to limitations in the ‘string-match?’ macro there.) The backport will probably require a copy of both ‘string-match?’ and ‘parse-rfc-822-date’. Thanks, Ludo’.
