On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:34:34AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > Core-updates was suggested on IRC. This would mean that after each graft > > commit, master would need to be merged into core-updates, and then the > > "ungrafting" patch could be applied.
> In practice, this means that after applying the graft to master, master > should be merged into core-updates before applying the ungrafting commit > to core-updates. > > What do you think? I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between our suggestions. Can you clarify yours? To give more detail, here is what I was suggesting: 1) Apply a graft to master. 2) Merge master into core-updates. 3) Apply a commit to core-updates that "un-does" the graft and applies the bug fix without a graft. Apologies if my original email was unclear.
