iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: >> >>> the gnome-updates branch has built on x86, and compared to master, there are >>> not that many regressions: >>> http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/108921?compare=master#tabs-now-fail >> >> In fact this slightly overestimates the failures compared to master; in >> particular, all the Octave/Fltk-related failures are already in master. >> >>> I saw a few that seem to be related to fonts and freetype, but I am not >>> a specialist. Do you think we could nevertheless merge back to master? >>> In any case, it would be nice if people who are competent in these matters >>> could have a look at the few remaining build failures. >> >> Since ‘make assert-binaries-available’ passed, I went ahead and merge >> the branch. > Oh, luckily the merge doesn't have effect. >> >> If anything goes wrong, please let us know! > Sorry, this is still not ready yet!
Indeed! I screwed things up in two ways: I didn’t revert the reverts, meaning the merge had not effect, and because of this, I failed to realize that things that were broken before were still broken. My bad! Specifically, Mark told me that at least these important packages fail to build: evolution-data-server, gedit, gnome-control-center, gnome-session, gtkmm, totem, mupdf. > I have skip a gjs test temporary, and disable the spell plugin of > gedit. I'd continue to work on the gnome-updates branch, and will > reply to this thread when it's ok. OK! Thanks, and sorry all for the mess! Ludo’.
