Am 24.04.2016 um 02:18 schrieb Leo Famulari: > If we can successfully update to 3.5, that would be best. Otherwise, we > should consider using 3.4.4.
I disagree. While Python typically is backward-compatible (except for the big change between Python 2 and Python 3), some minor incompatibilities are common when upgrading from e.g. 3.4 to 3.5. E.g. in 3.5 some deprecated things have been removed [1]. I suggest: - Rename "python" (python@3.4.x) to "python-3.4" - Add a new variable "python" as an alias for "python-3.4" - Add "python-3.5" (@3.5.1) (for now independent from "python" - Update python-3.4 to 3.4.5 So in feature we can easily provide two series (3.4, 3.5), which are still available for those who need it. At the same time we can easily switch "python" to the series we decide to be the "main" python for this release. This is much like we already do for icedtea. [1] https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#removed -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
