Eric Bavier <ericbav...@openmailbox.org> skribis: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:24:35 +0300 > Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:32:55PM -0500, ericbav...@openmailbox.org wrote: >> > From: Eric Bavier <bav...@member.fsf.org> >> > >> > * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (ttf2eot): New variable. >> > * gnu/packages/patches/ttf2eot-cstddef.patch: New patch. >> > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > [...] >> > + (license license:bsd-2) >> >> Issue 30[0] says that the readme says its bsd/lgpl licensed. > [...] >> >> [0] https://code.google.com/archive/p/ttf2eot/issues/30 > > I recall now: I listed bsd-2 as the license, because, while the README > says "License: Derived from WebKit, so BSD/LGPL 2/LGPL 2.1", > the single derived source file includes only BSD in its license > header, and the wrapper source contains no license header at all. Does > this seem alright?
I think so. Just briefly mention this as a comment for future reference. Thanks, Ludo’.
