On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 23:38 +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > > index ec92990..0e907ba 100644 > > --- a/NEWS > > +++ b/NEWS > [...] > > > > -* Changes in 0.9.1 (since 0.9.0) > > +* Changes in 0.10.0 (since 0.9.0) > > + > > +GNU Guix adopted a contributor code of conduct, see ‘CODE-OF- > > CONDUCT’ in the > > +source tree. > I think it would be reasonable to integrate this news in the current > scheme by not making it top level. What about moving this news in a > category "Contribution" or "Community"? > > While speaking about code of conducts I have found sometimes ago an > alternative version which achieves the same expected effect as the > current one but in a more consensual way: > > https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Foundation/CodeOfConduct?action= > show&redirect=CodeOfConduct > > Even if I know I belong to the minority who disagree with the > “Contributor Covenant” ideas, I think GNOME code of conduct would fit > better in Guix because it will not associate GNU with a movement > using > the term “Open Source” and promoting Github usage. > > WDYT?
Yes, the Contributor Covenant does not fit the GNU project's ideals very well. It is also my opinion that it is too political. I think we want a code of conduct which ensures we have a nice community, not one that makes us take political stances not related to free software. I like the GNOME Code Of Conduct, but also want to suggest the Debian Code of Conduct[1], which is more detailed, not political and fits this project very well since Debian has similar ideas to ours on free software (at least more than the Contributor Covenant), and is a distribution like GuixSD. The current code of conduct hasn't been there for long and changing it wouldn't cost anything. :) [1]: https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct > > Thanks, >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
